Dear Sir,
This is in response to the article in The New York Times - India Police Say They Hold 9 From Hindu Terrorist Cell
I appreciate the fact that this article was a well researched one. But there are many other factors associated with this issue. If you take the picture in reality, most of the Hindus in this country distrust the largest minority in India and there can be elements in the larger community who are as capable of creating mayhem...
But as a whole the Hindu community is very tolerant to the other minorities. As the West respects the majority community and the Israelis think they have to support and defend their community, the Hindus have the right to defend themselves. When you have a major party in India who appeases and follow pseudo-secular idealism, it is natural for the extreme right wing to retaliate.
This issue did not start very recently, this was from the days of Indian Independence and that was the reason Gandhi was assassinated. This concept of tolerance or rather I would call pluralism was propagated with a very selfish intent. I support the views of Gopal Godse, who was the brother of Nathuram Godse...
"His Principle of Peace Was Bogus"
That is true.
You cannot stop someone from attaining immortality, but the means to that state should be in concordance with human nature. This Gandhi propagated the term Secular. This is the most vulgar word I would find in my Lexicon. This country does not need some salvation from the caste system, it needs tolerance by both the largest communities. The Muslims in India should participate in the legislature, the executive and the judiciary, to instill a degree of confidence and trust.
This report carried that the accused Colonel was studying Chinese, but he was doing a course on the Arabic language.
I would call this as a cheap journalism to hood wink the West for personal gains.
I would request you do a through research before acting on the Issue.
I would rather have an identity than being Secular or invisible.
Thanks,
Sastha Prakash.
This is in response to the article in The New York Times - India Police Say They Hold 9 From Hindu Terrorist Cell
I appreciate the fact that this article was a well researched one. But there are many other factors associated with this issue. If you take the picture in reality, most of the Hindus in this country distrust the largest minority in India and there can be elements in the larger community who are as capable of creating mayhem...
But as a whole the Hindu community is very tolerant to the other minorities. As the West respects the majority community and the Israelis think they have to support and defend their community, the Hindus have the right to defend themselves. When you have a major party in India who appeases and follow pseudo-secular idealism, it is natural for the extreme right wing to retaliate.
This issue did not start very recently, this was from the days of Indian Independence and that was the reason Gandhi was assassinated. This concept of tolerance or rather I would call pluralism was propagated with a very selfish intent. I support the views of Gopal Godse, who was the brother of Nathuram Godse...
"His Principle of Peace Was Bogus"
That is true.
You cannot stop someone from attaining immortality, but the means to that state should be in concordance with human nature. This Gandhi propagated the term Secular. This is the most vulgar word I would find in my Lexicon. This country does not need some salvation from the caste system, it needs tolerance by both the largest communities. The Muslims in India should participate in the legislature, the executive and the judiciary, to instill a degree of confidence and trust.
This report carried that the accused Colonel was studying Chinese, but he was doing a course on the Arabic language.
I would call this as a cheap journalism to hood wink the West for personal gains.
I would request you do a through research before acting on the Issue.
I would rather have an identity than being Secular or invisible.
Thanks,
Sastha Prakash.
0 comments:
Post a Comment